Challenges in the Metabolomics-Based Biomarker Validation Pipeline.

As end-products of the intersection between the genome and environmental influences, metabolites represent a promising approach to the discovery of novel biomarkers for diseases. However, many potential biomarker candidates identified by metabolomics studies fail to progress beyond analytical validation for routine implementation in clinics. Awareness of the challenges present can facilitate the development and advancement of innovative strategies that allow improved and more efficient applications of metabolite-based markers in clinical settings. This minireview provides a comprehensive summary of the pre-analytical factors, required analytical validation studies, and kit development challenges that must be resolved before the successful translation of novel metabolite biomarkers originating from research. We discuss the necessity for strict protocols for sample collection, storage, and the regulatory requirements to be fulfilled for a bioanalytical method to be considered as analytically validated. We focus especially on the blood as a biological matrix and liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry as the analytical platform for biomarker validation. Furthermore, we examine the challenges of developing a commercially viable metabolomics kit for distribution. To bridge the gap between the research lab and clinical implementation and utility of relevant metabolites, the understanding of the translational challenges for a biomarker panel is crucial for more efficient development of metabolomics-based precision medicine.

Development and validation of an analytical method based on QuEChERS followed by UHPLC-ToF-MS for the determination of tropane alkaloids in buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum L.) and buckwheat products.

A method was developed for the determination of tropane alkaloids (TAs), including atropine, scopolamine, anisodamine and homatropine in buckwheat and related products. This work presents an optimised methodology based on QuEChERS (Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged and Safe) extraction procedure followed by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography combined with time-of-flight mass spectrometry for the determination of TAs (atropine, scopolamine, anisodamine and homatropine) in buckwheat samples. The analytical methodology was successfully validated, demonstrating good linearity, low limit of quantification, repeatability (RSDr < 15%), inter-day precision (RSDR < 19%) and recovery (74-113%). Finally, 13 commercial samples of buckwheat were analysed and the results demonstrated that they were in compliance with the current European regulations regarding TAs.

Analytical Validation of a Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase (TERT) Promoter Mutation Assay.

CONTEXT: TERT promoter mutated thyroid cancers are associated with a decreased rate of disease free and disease specific survival. High quality analytical validation of a diagnostic test promotes confidence in the results which inform clinical decision making. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the analytical validation of the Afirma TERT promoter mutation assay. METHODS: TERT promoter C228T and C250T variant detection in genomic DNA (gDNA) was analyzed by assessing variable DNA input and the limit of detection (LOD) of variant allele frequency (VAF). The negative and positive percent agreement (NPA and PPA) of the Afirma TERT test was examined against a reference primer pair as was the analytical specificity from potential interfering substances (RNA and blood gDNA). Further, the intra-run, inter-run and inter-laboratory reproducibility of the assay were tested. RESULTS: The Afirma TERT test is tolerant to variation in DNA input amount (7-13 ng) and can detect expected positive TERT promoter variants down to 5% VAF LOD at 7ng DNA input with > 95% sensitivity. Both NPA and PPA were 100% against the reference primer pair. The test remains accurate in presence of 20% RNA or 80% blood gDNA for an average patient sample that typically has 30% VAF. The test also demonstrated a 100% confirmation rate when compared with an external NGS-based reference assay executed in a non-Veracyte laboratory. CONCLUSION: The analytical robustness and reproducibility of the Afirma TERT test support its routine clinical use among thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology that are Afirma GSC suspicious or among Bethesda V/VI nodules.

Analytical validation of HER2DX genomic test for early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: HER2DX, a multianalyte genomic test, has been clinically validated to predict breast cancer recurrence risk (relapse risk score), the probability of achieving pathological complete response post-neoadjuvant therapy (pCR likelihood score), and individual ERBB2 messenger RNA (mRNA) expression levels in patients with early-stage human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. This study delves into the comprehensive analysis of HER2DX's analytical performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Precision and reproducibility of HER2DX risk, pCR, and ERBB2 mRNA scores were assessed within and between laboratories using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissues and purified RNA. Robustness was appraised by analyzing the impact of tumor cell content and protocol variations including different instruments, reagent lots, and different RNA extraction kits. Variability was evaluated across intratumor biopsies and genomic platforms [RNA sequencing (RNAseq) versus nCounter], and according to protocol variations. RESULTS: Precision analysis of 10 FFPE tumor samples yielded a maximal standard error of 0.94 across HER2DX scores (1-99 scale). High reproducibility of HER2DX scores across 29 FFPE tumors and 20 RNAs between laboratories was evident (correlation coefficients >0.98). The probability of identifying score differences >5 units was ≤5.2%. No significant variability emerged based on platform instruments, reagent lots, RNA extraction kits, or TagSet thaw/freeze cycles. Moreover, HER2DX displayed robustness at low tumor cell content (10%). Intratumor variability across 212 biopsies (106 tumors) was <4.0%. Concordance between HER2DX scores from 30 RNAs on RNAseq and nCounter platforms exceeded 90.0% (Cohen's κ coefficients >0.80). CONCLUSIONS: The HER2DX assay is highly reproducible and robust for the quantification of recurrence risk, pCR likelihood, and ERBB2 mRNA expression in early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer.

Analytical validation of NeXT Personal®, an ultra-sensitive personalized circulating tumor DNA assay.

We describe the analytical validation of NeXT Personal®, an ultra-sensitive, tumor-informed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assay for detecting residual disease, monitoring therapy response, and detecting recurrence in patients diagnosed with solid tumor cancers. NeXT Personal uses whole genome sequencing of tumor and matched normal samples combined with advanced analytics to accurately identify up to ~1,800 somatic variants specific to the patient's tumor. A personalized panel is created, targeting these variants and then used to sequence cell-free DNA extracted from patient plasma samples for ultra-sensitive detection of ctDNA. The NeXT Personal analytical validation is based on panels designed from tumor and matched normal samples from two cell lines, and from 123 patients across nine cancer types. Analytical measurements demonstrated a detection threshold of 1.67 parts per million (PPM) with a limit of detection at 95% (LOD95) of 3.45 PPM. NeXT Personal showed linearity over a range of 0.8 to 300,000 PPM (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.9998). Precision varied from a coefficient of variation of 12.8% to 3.6% over a range of 25 to 25,000 PPM. The assay targets 99.9% specificity, with this validation study measuring 100% specificity and in silico methods giving us a confidence interval of 99.92 to 100%. In summary, this study demonstrates NeXT Personal as an ultra-sensitive, highly quantitative and robust ctDNA assay that can be used to detect residual disease, monitor treatment response, and detect recurrence in patients.

Analytical validation and algorithm improvement of HepatoPredict kit to assess hepatocellular carcinoma prognosis before a liver transplantation.

Objectives: To verify the analytical performance of the HepatoPredict kit, a novel tool developed to stratify Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) patients according to their risk of relapse after a Liver Transplantation (LT). Methods: The HepatoPredict tool combines clinical variables and a gene expression signature in an ensemble of machine-learning algorithms to forecast the benefit of a LT in HCC patients. To ensure the accuracy and reliability of this method, extensive analytical validation was conducted to verify its specificity and robustness. The experiments were designed following the guidelines for multi-target genomic assays such as ISO201395-2019, MIQE, CLSI-MM16, CLSI-MM17, and CLSI-EP17-A. The validation process included reproducibility between operators and between RNA extractions and RT-qPCR runs, and interference of input RNA levels or varying reagent levels. A recently retrained version of the HepatoPredict algorithms was also tested. Results: The validation process demonstrated that the HepatoPredict kit met the required standards for robustness (p > 0.05), analytical specificity (inclusivity of 95 %), and sensitivity (LoB, LoD, linear range, and amplification efficiency between 90 and 110 %). The operator, equipment, input RNA, and reagents used had no significant effect on the HepatoPredict results. Additionally, the testing of a recently retrained version of the HepatoPredict algorithm, showed that this new version further improved the accuracy of the kit and performed better than existing clinical criteria in accurately identifying HCC patients who are more likely to benefit LT. Conclusions: Even with the introduced variations in molecular and clinical variables, the HepatoPredict kit's prognostic information remains consistent. It can accurately identify HCC patients who are more likely to benefit from a LT. Its robust performance also confirms that it can be easily integrated into standard diagnostic laboratories.

Development and validation of method for the simultaneous determination of sulfamethazine, trimethoprim and doxycycline in veterinary formulation using high performance liquid chromatography.

Sulfamethazine (SMZ), trimethoprim (TMP) and doxycycline (DOXY) are drugs of choice used in the treatment of intestinal and respiratory infections that affect poultry and swine. The aim of this study was develop and validate a simple, sensitive and fast method for the simultaneous determination of SMZ, TMP and DOXY in veterinary formulations by high-performance liquid chromatography. The separation was performed on a Macherey-Nagel C8 analytical column (4 × 125 mm, 5 µm), with a flow rate of 0.5 ml min-1 and detection at 268, 270 and 350 nm, for SMZ, TMP and DOXY, respectively. All measurements were performed in acetonitrile-water (45:55 v/v; pH 3.0). The analytical curves were linear (r > 0.9997) in the concentration range of 5.0-35.0 µg ml-1 for SMZ, 1.0-7.0 µg ml-1 for TMP and 7.0-13.0 µg ml-1 for DOXY. The method proved to be precise, robust, accurate and selective. In accelerated stability, the sample was analyzed for 6 months, with no major variations observed in organoleptic analysis and pH. Therefore, the developed method was proved to be suitable for routine quality control analyses for the simultaneous determination of SMZ, TMP and DOXY in pharmaceutical formulations.

Validation of the VirCapSeq-VERT system for differential diagnosis, detection, and surveillance of viral infections.

IMPORTANCE: Broad range assay for accurate and sensitive diagnostics.

Direct spectrofluorimetric methods as alternatives to compendial ones used for the quality control of biopharmaceuticals: development, validation and application

Abstract A simple, rapid, precise, accurate and sustainable spectrofluorimetric method (SFM) was developed, validated and applied for the determination of 4-aminobenzoic acid and aromatic amino acids (phenylalanine, tryptophan and tyrosine). These compounds are used in biopharmaceutical formulations and therefore must be analyzed by quality control laboratories to meet the criteria established in pharmacopoeias. In general, potentiometric titration (PT) is described in the compendia as the official analytical technique. However, this method showed low sensitivity and selectivity, and moreover was performed with a non-aqueous solvent (acetic acid), which led to higher consumption of reagents and consequently to the formation of residues. Therefore, the SFM was developed in aqueous medium at pH 7.2 using phosphate buffer. It was successfully validated according to the ICH guidelines and showed good linearity range (r>0.999), specificity, accuracy and precision (within and between days) and robustness. The test results were compared between the SFM and PT using raw material samples, while according to the F- and t-tests at 95% confidence level, no statistical difference was found between the methods.

Analytical Validation of Aptamer-Based Serum Vancomycin Monitoring Relative to Automated Immunoassays.

The practice of monitoring therapeutic drug concentrations in patient biofluids can significantly improve clinical outcomes while simultaneously minimizing adverse side effects. A model example of this practice is vancomycin dosing in intensive care units. If dosed correctly, vancomycin can effectively treat methicillin-resistant streptococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. However, it can also induce nephrotoxicity or fail to kill the bacteria if dosed too high or too low, respectively. Although undeniably important to achieve effectiveness, therapeutic drug monitoring remains inconvenient in practice due primarily to the lengthy process of sample collection, transport to a centralized facility, and analysis using costly instrumentation. Adding to this workflow is the possibility of backlogs at centralized clinical laboratories, which is not uncommon and may result in additional delays between biofluid sampling and concentration measurement, which can negatively affect clinical outcomes. Here, we explore the possibility of using point-of-care electrochemical aptamer-based (E-AB) sensors to minimize the time delay between biofluid sampling and drug measurement. Specifically, we conducted a clinical agreement study comparing the measurement outcomes of E-AB sensors to the benchmark automated competitive immunoassays for vancomycin monitoring in serum. Our results demonstrate that E-ABs are selective for free vancomycin─the active form of the drug, over total vancomycin. In contrast, competitive immunoassays measure total vancomycin, including both protein-bound and free drug. Accounting for these differences in a pilot study consisting of 85 clinical samples, we demonstrate that the E-AB vancomycin measurement achieved a 95% positive correlation rate with the benchmark immunoassays. Therefore, we conclude that E-AB sensors could provide clinically useful stratification of patient samples at trough sampling to guide effective vancomycin dose recommendations.

Validation of assays for measurement of oxidant compounds in saliva of pigs: Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), carbonyl, and reactive oxygen species (ROS).

Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), carbonyls and reactive oxygen species (ROS) are oxidant compounds that can provide useful information on the oxidative status. Pigs can be affected by oxidative stress in different situations including physiological conditions such as lactation and also in different diseases, and the measurement of these three analytes in saliva could be potentially useful as biomarkers of the redox status in this species. Assays for the measurement of TBARS and carbonyls by spectrophotometry and ROS by luminol-based chemiluminescence in pigs' saliva were analytically validated and were applied in saliva of pigs after an in vitro incubation with different doses of ascorbic acid (AA). All the assays showed a satisfactory analytical precision and accuracy. The 240 h-incubation of saliva samples with 60 mM of AA induced to an increased TBARS and carbonyls production. TBARS, carbonyls and ROS can be estimated in saliva of pigs by the assays validated in this report. In addition, these assays can detect changes in the concentration of these analytes associated to incubation of saliva samples with AA.

Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling in the Analysis of Endogenous Metabolites.

Volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) has arisen as a relevant tool in biological analysis, offering simplified sampling procedures and enhanced stability. Most of the attention VAMS has received in the past decade has been from pharmaceutical research, with most of the published work employing VAMS targeting drugs or other exogenous compounds, such as toxins and pollutants. However, biomarker analysis by employing blood microsampling has high promise. Herein, a comprehensive review on the applicability of VAMS devices for the analysis of endogenous metabolites/biomarkers was performed. The study presents a full overview of the analysis process, incorporating all the steps in sample treatment and validation parameters. Overall, VAMS devices have proven to be reliable tools for the analysis of endogenous analytes with biological importance, often offering improved analyte stability in comparison with blood under ambient conditions as well as a convenient and straightforward sample acquisition model.

Current status of the analytical validation of next generation sequencing applications for pharmacogenetic profiling.

BACKGROUND: Analytical validity is a prerequisite to use a next generation sequencing (NGS)-based application as an in vitro diagnostic test or a companion diagnostic in clinical practice. Currently, in the United States and the European Union, the intended use of such NGS-based tests does not refer to guided drug therapy on the basis of pharmacogenetic profiling of drug metabolizing enzymes, although the value of pharmacogenetic testing has been reported. However, in research, a large variety of NGS-based tests are used and have been confirmed to be at least comparable to array-based testing. METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic evaluation was performed screening and assessing published literature on analytical validation of NGS applications for pharmacogenetic profiling of CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, VKORC1 and/or UGT1A1. Although NGS applications are also increasingly used for implementation assessments in clinical practice, we show in the present systematic literature evaluation that published information on the current status of analytical validation of NGS applications targeting drug metabolizing enzymes is scarce. Furthermore, a comprehensive performance evaluation of whole exome and whole genome sequencing with the intended use for pharmacogenetic profiling has not been published so far. CONCLUSIONS: A standard in reporting on analytical validation of NGS-based tests is not in place yet. Therefore, many relevant performance criteria are not addressed in published literature. For an appropriate analytical validation of an NGS-based qualitative test for pharmacogenetic profiling at least accuracy, precision, limit of detection and specificity should be addressed to facilitate the implementation of such tests in clinical use.

Analytical Validation of an Immunohistochemical 7-Biomarker Prognostic Assay (immunoprint®) for Early-Stage Cutaneous Melanoma in Archival Tissue of Patients with AJCC v8 T2-T3 Disease.

Selected patients with early-stage melanoma have a "hidden high risk" of poor oncologic outcomes. They might benefit from clinical trials, and ultimately, if warranted by trial results, judicious everyday use of adjuvant therapy. A promising tool to identify these individuals is the immunoprint® assay. This immunohistochemical 7-biomarker prognostic test was clinically validated in three independent cohorts (N = 762) to classify early-stage patients as high-risk or low-risk regarding melanoma recurrence and mortality. Using College of American Pathologists (CAP) recommendations, we analytically validated this assay in primary melanoma specimens (N = 20 patients). We assessed assay precision by determining consistency of risk classification under repeated identical conditions (repeatability) or across varying conditions (reproducibility), involving separate assay runs, operators (laboratory scientists), and/or observers (e.g., dermatopathologists). Reference classification was followed by five analytical validation phases: intra-run/intra-operator, intra-observer, inter-run, inter-operator, and inter-observer. Concordance of classifications in each phase was assessed via Fleiss' kappa (primary endpoint) and percent agreement (secondary endpoint). Seven-marker signature classification demonstrated high consistency across validation categories (Fleiss' kappa 0.864-1.000; overall percent agreement 95-100%), in 9/10 cases, exceeding, and in 1/10 cases, closely approaching, CAP's recommended 0.9 level. The 7-marker assay has now been verified to provide excellent repeatability, reproducibility, and precision, besides having been clinically validated.

Analytical Method Development, Validation and Forced Degradation Study of Dapagliflozin by RP-HPLC.

BACKGROUND: Worldwide, it is projected that 285 million individuals have diabetes, and by 2030, this number is expected to climb to 438 million. About 90% of cases of diabetes mellitus are type 2 (T2DM). Insulin sensitizers, such as metformin and thiazolidinediones; insulin secretagogues, such as sulfonylureas and glinides; dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors; glucosidase inhibitors, or oral combination therapy are currently available treatments for type 2 diabetes. Some of these drugs exhibit serious limitations; thus, it is crucial to design an innovative therapy that is efficient and depends on a new channel. AIM: In the current work, a stability-indicating reverse phase HPLC (RP-HPLC) technique was developed and subsequently validated for the detection of dapagliflozin in its API. METHODS: The stability-indicating HPLC method for assay included the use of Kromasil 100-5-C8 (100 mm × 4.6 mm) column, UV detector 224 nm, mobile phase composition involving a mixture of acetonitrile:water (52:48), and a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. ICH guidelines were followed for the method's validation. To assess the method's specificity and stability in showing characteristics, stress degradation studies were carried out. The working standard solution of dapagliflozin was exposed to 1 and 2 N HCl by refluxing 1 and 2 N NaOH with 30% hydrogen peroxide by volume and UV radiation in order to conduct a degradation study. RESULTS: All system suitability parameters were determined to be within the intended ranges, and the drug's retention duration was discovered to be 1.67 minutes. It was also investigated as to how the drug degraded under various circumstances. The drug was discovered to be stable under situations of photolytic, thermal, neutral, alkaline, and oxidative deterioration. The developed stabilityindicating HPLC technique was validated in accordance with ICH Q2 recommendations, and the validation parameters, such as linearity, precision, and robustness, were achieved within the approved standards. CONCLUSION: It may be concluded that this method is stability-indicating and specific, and it can be successfully applied to analyze tablet dosage forms containing dapagliflozin.

Analytical and Clinical Validation of Assays for Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling (VAMS) of Drugs in Different Blood Matrices: A Literature Review.

Volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) is the newest and most promising sample-collection technique for quantitatively analyzing drugs, especially for routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and pharmacokinetic studies. This technique uses an absorbent white tip to absorb a fixed volume of a sample (10-50 µL) within a few seconds (2-4 s), is more flexible, practical, and more straightforward to be applied in the field, and is probably more cost-effective than conventional venous sampling (CVS). After optimization and validation of an analytical method of a drug taken by VAMS, a clinical validation study is needed to show that the results by VAMS can substitute what is gained from CVS and to justify implementation in routine practice. This narrative review aimed to assess and present studies about optimization and analytical validation of assays for drugs taken by VAMS, considering their physicochemical drug properties, extraction conditions, validation results, and studies on clinical validation of VAMS compared to CVS. The review revealed that the bio-analysis of many drugs taken with the VAMS technique was optimized and validated. However, only a few clinical validation studies have been performed so far. All drugs that underwent a clinical validation study demonstrated good agreement between the two techniques (VAMS and CVS), but only by Bland-Altman analysis. Only for tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid were three measurements of agreement evaluated. Therefore, VAMS can be considered an alternative to CVS in routine practice, especially for tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid. Still, more extensive clinical validation studies need to be performed for other drugs.

Analytical Validation of a Novel MicroRNA Panel for Risk Stratification of Cognitive Impairment.

We have been developing a novel approach to identify cognitive impairment-related biomarkers by profiling brain-enriched and inflammation-associated microRNA (miRNA) in plasma specimens of cognitively unimpaired and cognitively impaired patients. Here, we present an analytical validation of the novel miRNA panel, CogniMIR®, using two competing quantitative PCR technologies for the expression analysis of 24 target miRNAs. Total RNA from the plasma specimens was isolated using the MagMAX mirVana Kit, and RT-qPCR was performed using stem-loop-based TaqMan and LNA-based qPCR assays. Evaluation of RNA dilution series for our target 24 miRNAs, performed by two operators on two different days, demonstrated that all CogniMIR® panel miRNAs can be reliably and consistently detected by both qPCR technologies, with sample input as low as 20 copies in a qPCR reaction. Intra-run and inter-run repeatability and reproducibility analyses using RNA specimens demonstrated that both operators generated repeatable and consistent Cts, with R2 values of 0.94 to 0.99 and 0.96 to 0.97, respectively. The study results clearly indicate the suitability of miRNA profiling of plasma specimens using either of the qPCR technologies. However, the LNA-based qPCR technology appears to be more operationally friendly and better suited for a CAP/CLIA-certified clinical laboratory.

RAD51 as a biomarker for homologous recombination deficiency in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma: robustness and interobserver variability of the RAD51 test.

The RAD51 test is emerging as a promising biomarker for the assessment of functional homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). Yet, the robustness and reproducibility of the immunofluorescence-based RAD51 test, in different academic laboratories, have not been systematically investigated. Therefore, we tested the performance of the RAD51 assay in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) samples in four European laboratories. Here, we confirm that subtle differences in staining procedures result in low variability of RAD51 and γH2AX scores. However, substantial variability in RAD51 scoring was observed in some samples, likely due to complicating technical and biological features, such as high RAD51 signal-to-noise ratio and RAD51 heterogeneity. These results support the need to identify and perform additional quality control steps and/or automating image analysis. Altogether, resolving technical issues should be a priority, as identifying tumours with functional HRD is urgently needed to guide the individual treatment of HGSOC patients. Follow-up studies are needed to define the key tissue quality requirements to assess HRD by RAD51 in FFPE tumour samples, as this test could help in guiding the individual treatment of HGSOC patients.

Analytical validation of the 7-gene biosignature for prediction of recurrence risk and radiation therapy benefit for breast ductal carcinoma in situ.

Purpose: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), is a noninvasive breast cancer, representing 20-25% of breast cancer diagnoses in the USA. Current treatment options for DCIS include mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with or without radiation therapy (RT), but optimal risk-adjusted treatment selection remains a challenge. Findings from past and recent clinical trials have failed to identify a 'low risk' group of patients who do not benefit significantly from RT after BCS. To address this unmet need, a DCIS biosignature, DCISionRT (PreludeDx, Laguna Hills, CA), was developed and validated in multiple cohorts. DCISionRT is a molecular assay with an algorithm reporting a recurrence risk score for patients diagnosed with DCIS intended to guide DCIS treatment. In this study, we present results from analytical validity, performance assessment, and clinical performance validation and clinical utility for the DCISionRT test comprised of multianalyte assays with algorithmic analysis. Methods: The analytical validation of each molecular assay was performed based on the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines Quality Assurance for Design Control and Implementation of Immunohistochemistry Assays and the College of American Pathologists/American Society of Clinical Oncology (CAP/ASCO) recommendations for analytic validation of immunohistochemical assays. Results: The analytic validation showed that the molecular assays that are part of DCISionRT test have high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy/reproducibility (≥95%). The analytic precision of the molecular assays under controlled non-standard conditions had a total standard deviation of 6.6 (100-point scale), where the analytic variables (Lot, Machine, Run) each contributed <1% of the total variance. Additionally, the precision in the DCISionRT test result (DS) had a 95%CI ≤0.4 DS units under controlled non-standard conditions (Day, Lot, and Machine) for molecular assays over a wide range of clinicopathologic factor values. Clinical validation showed that the test identified 37% of patients in a low-risk group with a 10-year invasive IBR rate of ~3% and an absolute risk reduction (ARR) from RT of 1% (number needed to treat, NNT=100), while remaining patients with higher DS scores (elevated-risk) had an ARR for RT of 9% (NNT=11) and 96% clinical sensitivity for RT benefit. Conclusion: The analytical performance of the PreludeDx DCISionRT molecular assays was high in representative formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded breast tumor specimens. The DCISionRT test has been analytically validated and has been clinically validated in multiple peer-reviewed published studies.

How and when to measure pH in IVF culture media: validation of a portable blood gas analyzer in two IVF culture dishes for time lapse and conventional incubators.

PURPOSE: Maintaining a stable pH at optimal level in human embryo culture media is crucial for embryo development but poses a challenge for all IVF laboratories. We validate analytically reliable conditions for pH measurement that are as close as possible to the embryo microenvironment during IVF. METHODS: This was a multicentric study. A Siemens EPOC portable blood gas analyzer was used. The analytical validation was carried out under the culture medium (Global Total HSA®) conditions of use (microdroplets, under oil overlay, in a IVF incubator with (EmbryoScope®) or without a time lapse system (K system G210+®) and using IVF dishes. The validation included repeatability ("within-run" precision), total precision (between-day precision), trueness based on inter-laboratory comparison, inaccuracy based on external quality assessment and comparison to the reference technique. We also assessed the pre-analytical medium incubation time required to obtain a target value. RESULTS: A measurement after an incubation period of 24 to 48 h is more representative of the pH to which the embryo will be exposed throughout the culture. The "within-run" and "between-day" precision show very low coefficients of variation (CV%): 0.17 to 0.22% and 0.13 to 0.34%, respectively, with IVF culture media. Trueness (% bias) range from - 0.07 to - 0.03%. We demonstrate good correlation between EPOC and reference pH electrode with an overestimation of 0.03 pH units of EPOC. CONCLUSION: Our method demonstrates good analytical performance for IVF laboratories wishing to implement a robust quality assurance system to monitor pH in embryo culture media. Compliance with stringent pre-analytical and analytical conditions is essential.